Studies of Lowell (from Literary Friends and Acquaintance) — Reading Notes

(1 User reviews)   371
Howells, William Dean, 1837-1920 Project Gutenberg 2004 Not confirmed
American literature -- 19th century -- History and criticism; Authors, American -- 19th century -- Biography; Howells, William Dean, 1837-1920 -- Friends and associates Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 15,905
Reading time 70 min
Text sections 2

For Studies of Lowell (from Literary Friends and Acquaintance) — Reading Notes, the stored edition analysis reports 15,905 words, 1 hr 10 min estimated reading time, and 2 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 31.8 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “American literature -- 19th century -- History and criticism,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Howells's portrait of James Russell Lowell, drawn from personal acquaintance, examines Lowell's conversational style, editorial habits, and political conscience through specific anecdotes and observed contradictions.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.5/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

This was not the logic that would have justified the attitude of the anti-slavery men towards the fugitive slave act; but it was in accord with Lowell's feeling about John Brown, whom he honored while always condemning his violation of law; and it was in the line of all his later thinking. In this, he wished you to agree with him, or at least he wished to make you; but he did not wish you to be more of his mind than he was himself. In one of those squalid Irish neighborhoods I confessed a grudge (a mean and cruel grudge, I now think it) for the increasing presence of that race among us, but this did not please him; and I am sure that whatever misgiving he had as to the future of America, he would not have had it less than it had been the refuge and opportunity of the poor of any race or color. Yet he would not have had it this alone. There was a line in his poem on Agassiz which he left out of the printed version, at the fervent entreaty of his friends, as saying too bitterly his disappointment with his country. Writing at the distance of Europe, and with America in the perspective which the alien environment clouded, he spoke of her as "The Land of Broken Promise." It was a splendid reproach, but perhaps too dramatic to bear the full test of analysis, and yet it had the truth in it, and might, I think, have usefully stood, to the end of making people think. Undoubtedly it expressed his sense of the case, and in the same measure it would now express that of many who love their country most among us. It is well to hold one's country to her promises, and if there are any who think she is forgetting them it is their duty to say so, even to the point of bitter accusation. I do not suppose it was the "common man" of Lincoln's dream that Lowell thought America was unfaithful to, though as I have suggested he could be tender of the common man's hopes in her; but he was impeaching in that blotted line her sincerity with the uncommon man: the man who had expected of her a constancy to the ideals of her youth end to the high martyr-moods of the war which had given an unguarded and bewildering freedom to a race of slaves. He was thinking of the shame of our municipal corruptions, the debased quality of our national statesmanship, the decadence of our whole civic tone, rather than of the increasing disabilities of the hard-working poor, though his heart when he thought of them was with them, too, as it was in "the time when the slave would not let him sleep."

He spoke very rarely of those times, perhaps because their political and social associations were so knit up with the saddest and tenderest personal memories, which it was still anguish to touch. Not only was he

"--not of the race That hawk, their sorrows in the market place,"

but so far as my witness went he shrank from mention of them. I do not remember hearing him speak of the young wife who influenced him so potently at the most vital moment, and turned him from his whole scholarly and aristocratic tradition to an impassioned championship of the oppressed; and he never spoke of the children he had lost. I recall but one allusion to the days when he was fighting the anti-slavery battle along the whole line, and this was with a humorous relish of his Irish servant's disgust in having to wait upon a negro whom he had asked to his table.

Howells opens his study of James Russell Lowell with a concrete scene: the summer of 1865, when he delivered an ugly bronze inkstand from Italy. Lowell placed it on his writing table, where it remained for twenty-five years, its inkpot perpetually dry. This small, telling detail—a gift accepted but never used—introduces a memoir built not on grand pronouncements but on observed behavior. Howells writes as a younger man conscious of an "older and closer and stricter civilization" than his own, and his account preserves that distance even as it records intimacy.

Conversational Habits and Self-Interruption

Howells captures Lowell's talk through its rhythms and digressions. He notes that Lowell liked to "idle the time away" with a companion, postponing work. The memoir reproduces the texture of these evenings: Lowell lighting his pipe, settling into an easy chair, and drawing out his guest's shyness. Yet Howells also records moments when Lowell's patience frayed—as when he corrected Howells's Western woulds and shoulds in a copy of one of his books. The portrait is built from such small, precise observations: Lowell's habit of writing on a pasteboard pad on his knees, his defense of words like undisprivacied and disnatured, and his admission that he had been "hurt for literature by his scholarship."

Editorial Generosity and Its Limits

Howells, who served as editor of the Atlantic Monthly, describes Lowell's willingness to help other writers—but with a wry awareness of the cost. Lowell once invited a fellow man of letters to stay a fortnight in his house and share his study, a sacrifice Howells calls "truly dear" to any author of fixed habits. Yet Lowell also showed restraint: he seldom burdened Howells with manuscripts. The one exception was a Virginian's diary, which Lowell edited with "discreet pruning" until he grew too fond of the diarist to cut anything. This anecdote reveals both Lowell's generosity and his inability to maintain editorial detachment when his sympathies were engaged.

Political Conscience and Party Loyalty

Howells addresses Lowell's political actions with the same specificity he brings to personal habits. He recounts that after the 1876 election, some friends urged Lowell, as a Republican elector, to vote for Tilden and throw the presidency to him. Lowell refused, arguing that usage had made electors "strictly the instruments of the party which chose them." Howells reports this in a single paragraph, noting the "faintest trace of indignation" in Lowell's voice as he lit his pipe. The episode is not analyzed but presented as a window into Lowell's sense of honor—a man who felt tenderness for the "broken and ruined South" yet would not break faith with his party.

The Distance of Friendship

Throughout the memoir, Howells registers the subtle shifts in his relationship with Lowell. After Lowell's absence abroad, Howells observes that they had "lost the habit" of each other. This understatement—"that says much in such matters"—is characteristic of Howells's method. He does not dramatize estrangement but lets the reader infer it from the texture of the prose. The portrait is finally about the limits of intimacy: Howells loved Lowell, but always felt the weight of an older civilization. The memoir's value lies in its refusal to smooth over these tensions, preserving instead the exact grain of a friendship conducted across a gap of class, region, and temperament.

Diction as a Window into Character

Howells repeatedly returns to Lowell's attention to language. He notes that Lowell insisted characters in fiction should not say they "wanted" to do something but "wished." He records Lowell's own verbal preferences and his willingness to defend unusual words. These observations are not mere pedantry; they reveal Lowell's conception of literature as a craft with standards. Howells himself had a different view of democracy in language—"more of the heart"—and the tension between their approaches runs through the memoir. The result is a portrait that feels earned, built from the evidence of how Lowell spoke, wrote, and corrected others.

Howells's study is best read as a series of vignettes rather than a systematic biography. The reader should attend to the small gestures—the dry inkstand, the corrected woulds, the pipe lit before a political confession—that accumulate into a portrait of a man both generous and exacting. Howells never claims completeness; he offers only what he saw, at this moment and at that. The memoir's authority lies in its modesty.

I keep thinking about Howells’s Lowell—how someone can hold firm opinions and yet remain warm in conversation. It stayed with me, that quiet balance. Something similar lingers in The Lost Road — Background and Themes, where memory and principle weave together gently. I found myself pausing there too, not to finish, just to sit with it awhile.

Michael Roberts
4 weeks ago

4
4 out of 5 (1 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
  • ...
    James Brooks - 4 weeks ago
    Studies Of Lowell is a respectful and thorough account of Lowell's life and work. Howells' perspective is valuable, but the book is more of a memoir than a critical study, which might disappoint readers expecting deeper analysis. Still, it's a pleasant read for those who enjoy literary recollections.

  • ...
    Mercedes Daniels - 3 weeks ago
    Studies Of Lowell is a dry, overly reverent tribute that lacks critical edge. Howells is too close to his subject to offer objective evaluation. The book is more about Howells himself than Lowell, and it feels padded with personal anecdotes. I was hoping for a more rigorous examination, but got a eulogy instead.

  • ...
    Seth Henderson - 1 week ago
    Studies Of Lowell offers an intimate and illuminating portrait of James Russell Lowell. Howells writes with warmth and admiration, providing personal anecdotes and insightful criticism. It's a fascinating glimpse into the literary world of the 19th century and a tribute to a great writer. Essential for anyone interested in American literature.


Reader reflection

How did this book work for you?

Your answers remain private and are stored only in this browser.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

Where are you in your reading?

2

How did the book work for you overall?

3

Would you recommend this book to another reader?

4

Did the language feel accessible?

Related eBooks